Development Process

This document defines rules and recommendations for Opencast development. In particular, it defines how patches can be contributed, how they are merged and how releases are done.

If this document does not answer all of your questions, here is how you can get further help:

Contributing Code

Opencast sources can be found on GitHub. The easiest way to contribute code to the project is by creating a pull request against the project's official repository. More details about the structure of this repository are explained later in this guide.

GitHub

Acceptance Criteria for Patches in Different Versions

Updates between minor versions should be as smooth as possible and should usually not need manual intervention. That is why patches may only be accepted into releases branches (r/?.x) if they meet the following criteria:

Patches which do not meet these criteria should target the branch develop to become part of the next major version.

Note: Patches adding features should target the current stable release (r/{{ opencast_major_version }}.x), or develop, and are strongly discouraged from targetting the legacy release. Features going into the legacy release will need a good reason, and must be highly self contained.

To determine the acceptance of patches, all pull requests will be discussed in the technical meeting. This protects against inclusion of controversial changes with no broader consent among committers.

Reviews

Before a patch is merged, it needs to be reviewed. The reviewer tries to make sure that the patch merges without conflicts, that it works as expected and that it does not break anything else.

If the reviewer discovers any kind of issue, he should comment on the pull request in GitHub, so that the author can fix the problem.

Pull Request Guidelines

When reviewing a pull request, it is always easier if the reviewer knows what the ticket is about, and has a rough idea of what work has been done. To this end, there are a few expectations for all pull requests:

Some changes require special attention:

Folder Description
etc/listproviders Changes here might need to be reflected in the static mockup data for the Admin UI facade found in modules/admin-ui/src/test/resources/app/admin-ng/resources
modules/admin-ui/src/main/java In case the interface of the Admin UI facade changes, those changes need to be also reflected in the static mockup data for the Admin UI facade found in modules/admin-ui/src/test/resources/app.

While a committer may accept a patch even if it does not meet these expectations, it is encouraged that anyone filing a pull request ensures that they meet these expectations.

Merging Pull Requests

After a pull request has received at least one approving review and passes the automated tests, it is ready for merging. Only a committer can perform a merge, so if a reviewed pull request has not yet received attention from a committer feel free to contact one.

There are a couple of rules that committers must follow when merging pull requests. These are:

Automatically closing issues when a PR is merged

Our pull request template wants you to "close an accompanying issue." This can be done as per the GitHub documentation by using one of several magic keywords in front of a valid issue number, either in the pull request description, or in any of the commit messages of the commits you want to merge. For example:

This PR fixes #1234.

A word of caution: due to our branching model this might not always work as expected. GitHub only recognizes the magic words when acting on the default branch of the repository, which in our case is develop. Issues mentioned in descriptions of PRs targeting develop or in any message of a commit that lands in develop will be automatically closed.

Thus, if you are submitting a PR not targeting develop, and you want to use this feature, you have to mention the magic words in a commit message. Tne PR description does not work in this case. And even then, the issue will only be closed, once your merged commits reach develop by our forward merging process.

Mentioning related issues in the PR description in addition to the commit message(-s) might of course still be useful for reviewers!

Reviewing Code

Reviewing pull requests is as important as creating them, as pull requests cannot be merged without at least one approving review. Furthermore, the more people review a pull request the more likely it is that potential issues are found early, saving time and money down the line.

This section intends to give guidelines on what to look for when reviewing a pull request. A review does not need to cover all of these, do as much as you can and then (at least roughly) write in the review what you looked at. Also if you found an issue with one of the guidelines, e.g. the description is not making any sense, it is completely okay to request a change to the description and holding of on reviewing other parts of the PR until the description is fixed.

While a pull requests of course contains changes to the Opencast code base, it also consists of its trappings. Usually it makes sense to look at those first.

Trappings

Title

Was a sensible title chosen? Does the title serve as good identifier for the pull request? A bad title might be "LTI bug". A good title might be "Fix a bug where LTI users can not play videos".

Description

Was a sensible description chosen?

Issues

If the pull request fixes an existing issue on GitHub, is it linked in the pull request? If one or more issues are linked in the pull request, does the pull request actually address them?

Labels

Is the pull request labelled? Is it labelled sensibly?

Code base changes

Hygene

A pull request should have one clear goal. If there are multiple goals, it is usually best to split these among multiple pull requests.

Does the pull request have a sane commit tree?

Does the pull request target the right branch? Usually

Documentation

Functionality

Do the changes actually do what the description promises?

Proofreading: Read through the code and try to think it through.

Test the code by compiling and running it. Try to test it in ways that won't be caught by the automated tests. Test it in a distributed Opencast setup if possible.

Tests

Does the code require (unit) testing? Are the given tests sensible? Are there any test cases missing?

Video guides

The GitHub web interface is ever-changing. If you are looking for help with navigating the website, check the official GitHub documentation.

If videos are more your style:

Git Repository Branching Model

While the Opencast repository and branching model is inspired by GitFlow, there have been some distinct changes to how release branches are used and releases are tagged. The purpose of this is mainly to support multiple, simultaneous versions and maintenance releases.

Swift overview:

To get a closer look at the branching model, let us consider a simple example with a single release:

Git branching model with a single versions

As described above, develop is the branch used for preparing the next version. At some point marked in the release schedule, the release branch is cut from develop. This action also marks the feature freeze for that version since features may be merged only into the develop branch.

After the release branch is cut, the development on the develop branch may continue as before. Features can (and should) be merged without waiting for the next version to be released. Thus, the creation of a release branch also marks the beginning of the development for the next version.

In contrast to that, only bug fixes may be merged into the release branch. This branch should be tested with care, so that bugs can be identified and fixed before the release.

During the whole process the release manager will regularly merge back the release branch into develop or, if existent, the next active release branch.

The releases themselves are not part of the release branch. Instead, the release manager branches off, makes the necessary changes to the pom files (and possibly the UI) and creates a separately tagged commit.

Finally, after a release is done, more bug fixes may be added to the release branch. The release manager should identify if there are enough commits to be put into a maintenance release.

Even after an Opencast version has been released, more bugs may be found and fixes for them merged into the release branch. When the release manager considers that the number or importance of such bug fixes is sufficient, he may decide to create a new maintenance release. The version 6.1 above is an example of that.

With Opencast supporting two major releases, you may find not one, but up to three active release branches.

Git branching model with two versions

Mostly, this is just the same as the simpler model from before. The branches exist separately from each other and only interact through merges from older to newer versions so that bug fixes from a release branch will automatically become part of the next Opencast versions (and develop), without having to create additional pull requests.

For example, a pull request may be merged into r/7.x, r/7.x will then be merged into develop or, if it already exists, r/8.x and from there into develop. That way patches bubble through all newer versions and finally end up in develop.

Release Process

As indicated above, the release cycle of a new Opencast version starts when a release branch is cut. Patches merged into develop after the cut will be part of the next version, but not the one just cut.

This is why the position of release manager for the next Opencast version should be assigned at this point. The current release manager should therefore ask for volunteers in the mailing lists. For more details about the rights and responsibilities of a release manager, please have a look at the Release Manager Guide.

Preparations

The first phase of the release consists of adding new features and defining the release schedule. It is the duty of the release manager to orchestrate this. This does not necessarily mean that release managers merge or review pull requests, but that they talk to developers and ensure the merge process is driven forward.

Release Schedule

Releases should happen twice a year, usually within a time span of 9.5 months between the cut of the previous release branch and the final release. The release manager should create a release schedule as soon as possible, identifying when the release branch is cut and when the final release will happen. Additionally, he should coordinate with the QA manager to identify phases for internal and public testing.

Usually, a release schedule will look like this:

Date Phase
May 15th Feature Freeze
May 24th Translation week
May 31st Public QA phase
June 15th Release of Opencast 7.0

Release Branch

The release branch is created from develop. The release branch is named r/A.x (e.g. r/7.x) to indicate that it is the origin of all releases with the major version of A. The creation of the release branch marks the feature freeze for a given version, as no more features can be merged into a release branch.

To ensure that all fixes that go into the release branch will become part of develop (and thus part of the next version of Opencast) with a minimum amount of work, the release manager will merge the release branch into develop on a regular basis. He may request assistance from certain developers in case of merge conflicts. This process continues until the next release branch is cut.

Tags

Git tags are used to mark Opencast releases. Here is how a release looks like in the history:

Opencast version tag in git

To create a version based on a given state of the release branch (commit A), the release manager will branch off from this commit, make the necessary version changes to all pom.xml files and create a commit which is then finally tagged. This tag is then pushed to the community repository.

For more details about how to create a release, have a look at the Release Manager Guide.

Maintenance Releases

After a final release, additional issues may show up. These issues may be fixed on the ongoing release branch and at some point released as maintenance release.

Maintenance releases will be cut monthly for the latest stable release. For legacy releases, it is up to the release manager to decide when it is worthwhile to make the cut.

Quality Assurance

As any piece of software, Opencast may contain bugs. It is the duty of the whole community to identify these bugs, report them and possibly fix them to improve Opencast as product.

Additionally, before releasing a new version of Opencast, the current release manager and quality assurance manager will coordinate test phases dedicated to new releases in order to identify possible problems ahead of time. The whole community will be requested to participate in this testing.

Reporting Bugs

If you identify any bugs, please report them on Github!. Please make sure to describe in detail how to reproduce the problem, and which version of Opencast you are experiencing the issue on.

Security Issues

If you discover a problem that has severe implications for system security, please do not publish this information on list. Instead, send a report of the problem to security@opencast.org. The message will be forwarded to the private committers list, where the issue will be discussed. Once a patch for the problem is ready, a security notice will be released along with it.

Unit Tests

All Opencast modules should have built-in unit tests to check that they are actually doing what they are supposed to do and that code patches do not break the existing functionality. These tests are automatically run whenever the project is built. If building repeatedly fails due to test failures, then something is most likely wrong. Please report this as a severe bug.

For a guide on how to write unit tests, see Writing Unit Tests, a talk how to write (good!) unit tests.

User Tests

Before each major release, the release and quality assurance managers will ask the whole community to participate in the execution of a set of manual tests. These tests are designed to check that important functionalities of Opencast work as expected even if users are in slightly different environments or choose different methods to achieve a certain goal.

Such a call for participation will usually be raised both on the lists, the technical and the adopters meeting. If it is possible for you to participate, please do so. Identifying possible problems early will immensely benefit the release process.

Test Server

Some institutions provide public testing infrastructure for Opencast. Use them to try out the most recent development version of Opencast. They are meant for testing. Do not fear to break them. They are meant for testing.

For a list of test servers, take a look at the infrastructure documentation.